Roth Jackson | Legal Services - Richmond VA & McLean VARoth Jackson | Legal Services - Richmond VA & McLean VA
  • Home
  • Our Team
    • Richmond Office
      • E.G. Allen, III
      • Joseph P. Bowser
      • caroline e. browder
      • andrew m. condlin
      • sean m. gibbons
      • kim m. lacy
      • jennifer d. mullen
      • allyson martin sladic
      • C. Taylor Smith
      • Jennifer L. West
    • Tysons Office
      • genevieve c. bradley
      • Joseph P. Bowser
      • joseph f. jackson
      • ashley b. kyle
      • mitchell n. roth
      • Jennifer S. Varughese
  • What We Do
    • banking & finance
    • bankruptcy & creditor rights
    • commercial litigation
    • commercial real estate
    • corporate
    • direct marketing & regulatory compliance
    • employment & labor law
    • Immigration
    • land use & zoning
    • privacy and data security practice group
  • News & Insights
    • TCPA
    • Immigration News
    • Employment & Labor Law News
  • Community Outreach
  • Contact Us

H-4 Work Authorization to be Rescinded

February 25, 2019kthomas@rothjackson.comImmigration Law

On February 20, 2019, the Department of Homeland Security submitted a proposed regulation to the Office of Management and Budget, which would have the effect of eliminating employment authorization for H-4 individuals whose H-1B spouses are “in line” for employment-based permanent residency. OMB will review this proposed rule and will issue a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register, and they will take public comments.

Who is currently allowed to have employment authorization in this category? H-4 is the visa classification given to spouses of H-1B visa status holders. Since 2015, certain H-4 spouses have been given the ability to apply for work authorization in the United States. This is limited to individuals whose spouses have H-1B status under the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act of 2000, as amended by the 21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, or whose spouses are the principal beneficiary of an approved Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (Form I-140).

Who will be impacted? It is estimated that 90,000 or more individuals currently have employment authorization in this category. If this change is implemented, it will affect not only the economic situation of the impacted families, but also the thousands of employers who rely upon these (frequently highly educated) employees. USCIS has indicated that this rule will be “economically significant,” meaning that it may have an impact of $100,000,000 or more. Because of country-chargeability and the current nature of the backlogs in employment-based categories, the heaviest impact will be on spouses of H-1B visa holders who were born in India.

What is the anticipated timing? Because of the OMB review and period of notice and comment, this process will likely take several months.

What action is recommended? At this time, it is unclear what will happen to currently valid or pending EADs. Affected companies and individuals would be well-served to discuss with an immigration attorney whether it would be prudent to seek to enter the H-1B “lottery” for the upcoming fiscal year. USCIS accepts these cap-subject petitions during the first five business days of April, meaning that cap-subject petitions should be prepared in March.

Employers and individuals should also consider submitting comments once the period of notice and comment is open.

Where can I find further information?

Proposed Rule Announcement
FAQs on Rulemaking from the OMB

 

By Jennifer West

For more information contact Jennifer West at jwest@rothjackson.com or Visit Attorney Profile Here.

Recent Posts

  • Phone Hacked at Local Immigration Court
  • Important Reminder for Missing / Delayed RFEs
  • Uncertainty Surrounding Personal Jurisdiction and Purposeful Availment in TCPA cases post-Hood
  • Reminder for Employers with 100+ Employees, OSHA’s Vaccine/Weekly Testing Mandate Becomes Effective January 10, 2022

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Categories

Archives

  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
Awarded in 2016, 2018, and 2019

find us at

Facebook
LinkedIn

Richmond

1519 Summit Avenue
Suite 102
Richmond, VA 23230

(804) 441-8440
(804) 441-8438

Tysons Corner

8200 Greensboro Drive
Suite 820
McLean, VA 22102

(703) 485-3535
(703) 485-3525

  • Home
  • Our Team
    • Richmond Office
      • E.G. Allen, III
      • Joseph P. Bowser
      • caroline e. browder
      • andrew m. condlin
      • sean m. gibbons
      • kim m. lacy
      • jennifer d. mullen
      • allyson martin sladic
      • C. Taylor Smith
      • Jennifer L. West
    • Tysons Office
      • genevieve c. bradley
      • Joseph P. Bowser
      • joseph f. jackson
      • ashley b. kyle
      • mitchell n. roth
      • Jennifer S. Varughese
  • What We Do
    • banking & finance
    • bankruptcy & creditor rights
    • commercial litigation
    • commercial real estate
    • corporate
    • direct marketing & regulatory compliance
    • employment & labor law
    • Immigration
    • land use & zoning
    • privacy and data security practice group
  • News & Insights
    • TCPA
    • Immigration News
    • Employment & Labor Law News
  • Community Outreach
  • Contact Us
© 2018 Roth Jackson Gibbons Condlin, PLCFreshySites
Terms and Conditions
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case.
Case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.